Wednesday, February 22, 2012

You’re reading what?

My name is Vicki, and I am a reading snob. (Recovering) I wasn’t always snobbish about what I read. As a young person, I eagerly devoured books that ranged from Edgar Rice Burroughs’ Tarzan stories to the westerns of Louis L’Amour, from Victoria Holt’s gothic romances to Ayn Rand’s paeans to “objectivism,” and of course mysteries of all types. So what changed?

Well, my years as an English/American Lit major certainly introduced me to what academia considered “quality” fiction. But that didn’t really sway me, I don’t think. Because the truth is, I find many books considered classics downright boring. No, I think what happened was that over many years of reading a wide range of books and authors, I came to appreciate good writing. I learned to recognize formulaic plots and clichéd writing devices. The more poorly written novels just couldn’t hold my attention anymore.

I then fell into a trap, however, assuming that just because a writer wrote in a certain genre (romance) or a book cover carried a certain style of illustration (Fabio), it must be poorly written. How wrong I was.

Two things made me realize the error of my ways: First, I was discussing books with a woman I met at a party. I mentioned that I really liked Tony Hillerman’s books. He wrote mysteries set in the American Southwest and his main characters are Navajo Tribal Policemen, Jim Chee and Joe Leaphorn, two of the most fully drawn characters I’ve ever encountered in any book. I want to have these guys over to my house for dinner.

Anyway, this woman responded, with a noticeable sniff: “I prefer Barbara Kingsolver’s writing. Hillerman writes at a fourth- or fifth-grade level.” I hadn’t read Kingsolver at the time, but felt somewhat slapped in the face by this comment. (I went on to read several of Kingsolver’s books, and she has become a favorite author of mine.)

The second wakeup call came from a website I frequent called Readers Paradise – a place for people who love to read and discuss books. Posters there read books of every type and category: fiction, non-fiction, romance, mystery, memoir, and more. And everyone is welcome. Several people kept mentioning that they liked reading Georgette Heyer. I researched Heyer, and learned that she is considered “the undisputed queen of Regency Romances.” I confess I didn’t know what that meant. But looking at the covers of her books, I was somewhat put off.

This just didn’t look like something I would read…so I didn’t. But I kept seeing her name mentioned with such fondness that I finally picked up one of her books, and I thoroughly enjoyed it. I have since read several others and plan to read more.

I never want to be that sniffy woman. I want to always stay open to new authors and new stories, because without that openness, I might miss out on something truly astounding.                                            

6 comments:

  1. Hi Vicki,
    This is fun! I always snickered at Nora Roberts romances. Now I enjoy them. She certainly has her devices and cliches, but also uses some pretty imagination writing!

    ReplyDelete
  2. I suppose the classical writers get it right pretty much all the time. But if a reader stays within that circle, she misses a lot. I recently reach Stephen King's latest, 11/22/63, and I had never read anything of his because I'm not really a "horror" fan. Once in a while I found his language clunky, but the story was great!

    ReplyDelete
  3. Glad you enjoyed it, Michelle. I still haven't read a Nora Roberts book, but as with Heyer, I hear from lots of people who enjoy her books. Maybe I'll give her a try.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Hi Laura. I agree about the classical writers, and about King. I did read "The Shining," but nothing else. Sometimes it's not about snobbery so much as it is about taste. I'm not a horror fan in books or movies. I also don't care for graphic depictions of violence -- a topic I plan to write about in a future post.

    ReplyDelete
  5. I'm not a book snob but I sure can be blamed for falling for a book jacket. You can't judge a book by its cover, can you?

    ReplyDelete
  6. You're right slowblossom. At least we're not supposed to judge a book by its cover -- but , sadly, some books may not even get a chance to be judged because of their covers. I have some thoughts about that, too ... if I could just get them pinned down.

    ReplyDelete